githubEdit

gear-complexComplex Sensitivities

Besides the eigenvalue sensitivities, there is a number of functionals of interest for analysis such as the reactivity coefficients Δρ\Delta\rho, effective delayed neutron fraction βeff\beta_{eff}, effective neutron generation time Λeff\Lambda_{eff}, effective neutron lifetime eff\ell_{eff}, etc. However, not many stochastic neutron transport simulation tools are capable of computing these sensitivities directly, requiring further data curation.

Reactivity difference

Reactivity coefficients Δρ\Delta\rho are a crucial part in a safety analysis. Neutron transport codes do not usually compute sensitivities to them, and obtaining them requires some additional efforts to get the uncertainty influence on them. Since this kind functionals are comprised of the eigenvalues in two states, the reactivity effect sensitivity can also be constructed from the corresponding two eigenvalue sensitivities.

S(Δρ,α)=αΔρd(Δρ)dαS(\Delta\rho,\alpha)=\frac{\alpha}{\Delta\rho}\frac{\text{d}(\Delta\rho)}{\text{d}\alpha}

where Δρ1k01k\Delta\rho\equiv \frac{1}{k_0} - \frac{1}{k} and k0k_0 is the reference state eigenvalue.

Expanding Δρ\Delta\rho yields the following widely used expression:

S(Δρ,α)=S(k,α)/kS(k0,α)/k0Δρ=S(k,α)k0S(k0,α)kkk0S(\Delta\rho,\alpha)=\frac{S(k,\alpha)/k-S(k_0,\alpha)/k_0}{\Delta\rho}=\frac{S(k,\alpha)k_0-S(k_0,\alpha)k}{k-k_0}

Effective delayed neutron fraction

In the case of the effective delayed neutron fraction βeff\beta_{eff}, it can be approximated as:

βeff1kpk\beta_{eff}\approx1-\frac{k_p}{k}

Through some algebraic actions one can obtain the following widely used equation for quantifying the sensitivity of the effective delayed neutron fraction via the results of two simulation:

S(βeff,α)=αβeffdβeffdα=αβeffddα(1kpk)=kpkkp[S(k,α)S(kp,α)]S(\beta_{eff},\alpha)=\frac{\alpha}{\beta_{eff}}\frac{\textnormal{d}\beta_{eff}}{\textnormal{d}\alpha}=\frac{\alpha}{\beta_{eff}}\frac{\textnormal{d}}{\textnormal{d}\alpha}\left(1-\frac{k_p}{k}\right)=\frac{k_p}{k-k_p}\left[S(k,\alpha)-S(k_p,\alpha)\right]

where kpk_p is the prompt eigenvalue, i.e. with no delayed neutrons.

Prompt decay constant

Another functional is the prompt decay constant αp\alpha_p (prompt alpha eigenvalue, Rossia-alpha), which is of interest from the point of validation and was firstly applied in the production of ENDF/B-VII.1. The sensitivity can be obtained via the following equation:

S(αp,α)=ααpdαpdα=ααpddα(kp1eff)=kpkp1S(kp,α)S(eff,α)S(\alpha_p,\alpha)=\frac{\alpha}{\alpha_p}\frac{\textnormal{d}\alpha_p}{\textnormal{d}\alpha}=\frac{\alpha}{\alpha_p}\frac{\textnormal{d}}{\textnormal{d}\alpha}\left(\frac{k_p-1}{\ell_{eff}}\right)=\frac{k_p}{k_p-1}S(k_p,\alpha)-S(\ell_{eff},\alpha)

Breeding ratio

The breeding ratio (BRBR) is another functional for consideration defining a ratio of fissile nuclide production rate, e.g. 233U^{233}\textnormal{U} and 239Pu^{239}\textnormal{Pu}, and fissile nuclide removal rate, e.g. 232Th^{232}\textnormal{Th} and 238U^{238}\textnormal{U}. Modern stochastic tools do now allow one to compute the sensitivity to it directly and are limited to ratios of only one score in both numerator and denominator. This significantly limits the capability of computing sensitivities of more complex ratios such as the breeding ratio and, consequently, their analysis. To circumvent this limitation, it is suggested to compute the breeding ratio sensitivities through two different sensitivities:

S(BR,α)=αBRdBRdα=αBRdBRdα=11+Rf/RγS(Rγ,α)11+Rγ/RfS(Rf,α)S(BR,\alpha)=\frac{\alpha}{BR}\frac{\textnormal{d}BR}{\textnormal{d}\alpha}=\frac{\alpha}{BR}\frac{\textnormal{d}BR}{\textnormal{d}\alpha}=-\frac{1}{1+R_f/R_{\gamma}}S(R_{\gamma},α)-\frac{1}{1+R_{\gamma}/R_f}S(R_f,α)

where RfR_f is the ratio of the (n,f)(n,f) reaction on a fissile nuclide and the (n,γ)(n,\gamma) reaction on a fertile nuclide; RγR_{\gamma} is the ratio of the (n,γ)(n,\gamma) reaction on a fissile nuclide and the (n,γ)(n,\gamma) reaction on a fertile nuclide.

It is possible to account any number of reactions using general formulation:

S(BR,α)=1BRiBRi2(j[Rγ,j,iS(Rγ,j,i,α)+Rf,j,iS(Rf,j,i,α)])S(BR,\alpha)=-\frac{1}{BR}\sum_i BR^2_i\left( \sum_j[R_{\gamma,j,i}S(R_{\gamma,j,i},\alpha)+R_{f,j,i}S(R_{f,j,i},\alpha)]\right)

where BRiBR_i is the production rate on the ii-nuclide, i.e. BR=iBRiBR=\sum_i BR_i; Rx,j,iR_{x,j,i} is the ratio of the xx reaction on a fissile jj-nuclide and the (n,γ)(n,\gamma) reaction on the fertile nuclide.

Although the approach is general, it would require more quantifications of different ratios making it rather cumbersome. For example, accounting 240Pu^{240}\textnormal{Pu} and 241Pu^{241}\textnormal{Pu} would require calculating eight ratios. Thus, only previous formulation is considered reasonable to use in SAUNA.

Ratio of functionals

There are some functionals that can be represented as a ratio of them. The basic idea for these functionals is that the sensitivity of them is merely a difference two sensitivities representing the numerator and denominator. For a critical system the prompt decay constant is αp=βeff/Λeff\alpha_p=-\beta_{eff}/\Lambda_{eff} and Λeff=eff\Lambda_{eff}=\ell_{eff}, and the sensitivity equation becomes simpler:

S(αp,α)=S(βeff,α)S(Λeff,α)=S(βeff,α)S(eff,α)S(\alpha_p,\alpha)=S(\beta_{eff},\alpha)-S(\Lambda_{eff},\alpha)=S(\beta_{eff},\alpha)-S(\ell_{eff},\alpha)

Another example is the simplified representation of the neutron generation time Λeff\Lambda_{eff} if the effective neutron lifetime eff\ell_{eff} is known (the case of using Serpent):

Last updated